We consider termination of the STRS with no additional rule schemes:

  Signature: and      :: c -> c -> c
             arrow    :: t -> t -> t
             lessthan :: t -> t -> c

  Rules: lessthan(arrow(X, Y), arrow(U, V)) -> and(lessthan(U, X), lessthan(Y, V))

The system is accessible function passing by a sort ordering that equates all sorts.

We start by computing the initial DP problem D1 = (P1, R, f, c), where:

  P1. (1) lessthan#(arrow(X, Y), arrow(U, V)) => lessthan#(U, X)
      (2) lessthan#(arrow(X, Y), arrow(U, V)) => lessthan#(Y, V)

***** We apply the Reduction Pair [with HORPO] Processor on D1 = (P1, R, f, c).

Constrained HORPO yields:

  lessthan#(arrow(X, Y), arrow(U, V)) (>) lessthan#(U, X)
  lessthan#(arrow(X, Y), arrow(U, V)) (>) lessthan#(Y, V)
  lessthan(arrow(X, Y), arrow(U, V)) (>=) and(lessthan(U, X), lessthan(Y, V))

We do this using the following settings:

* Disregarded arguments:

  and      1 
  lessthan 2 

* Precedence and permutation:

    arrow      { 1 }   2
  = lessthan#  { 1 2 }
  = lessthan   { }     1
  > and        { 2 }

* Well-founded theory orderings:

  [>]_{Bool} = {(true,false)}
  [>]_{Int}  = {(x,y) | x < 1000 /\ x < y }

All dependency pairs were removed.

Processor output: { }.