We consider termination of the STRS with no additional rule schemes: Signature: cons :: d -> e -> e g :: b map_1 :: (d -> d) -> e -> e map_2 :: (d -> a -> d) -> a -> e -> e map_3 :: (b -> d -> c -> d) -> b -> c -> e -> e Rules: map_1(F, cons(Y, U)) -> cons(F(Y), map_1(F, U)) map_2(I, V, cons(P, X1)) -> cons(I(P, V), map_2(I, V, X1)) map_3(G1, g, Y1, cons(V1, W1)) -> cons(G1(g, V1, Y1), map_3(G1, g, Y1, W1)) The system is accessible function passing by a sort ordering that equates all sorts. We start by computing the initial DP problem D1 = (P1, R, i, c), where: P1. (1) map_1#(F, cons(Y, U)) => map_1#(F, U) (2) map_2#(I, V, cons(P, X1)) => map_2#(I, V, X1) (3) map_3#(G1, g, Y1, cons(V1, W1)) => map_3#(G1, g, Y1, W1) ***** We apply the Graph Processor on D1 = (P1, R, i, c). We compute a graph approximation with the following edges: 1: 1 2: 2 3: 3 There are 3 SCCs. Processor output: { D2 = (P2, R, i, c) ; D3 = (P3, R, i, c) ; D4 = (P4, R, i, c) }, where: P2. (1) map_1#(F, cons(Y, U)) => map_1#(F, U) P3. (1) map_2#(I, V, cons(P, X1)) => map_2#(I, V, X1) P4. (1) map_3#(G1, g, Y1, cons(V1, W1)) => map_3#(G1, g, Y1, W1) ***** We apply the Subterm Criterion Processor on D2 = (P2, R, i, c). We use the following projection function: nu(map_1#) = 2 We thus have: (1) cons(Y, U) |>| U All DPs are strictly oriented, and may be removed. Hence, this DP problem is finite. Processor output: { }. ***** We apply the Subterm Criterion Processor on D3 = (P3, R, i, c). We use the following projection function: nu(map_2#) = 3 We thus have: (1) cons(P, X1) |>| X1 All DPs are strictly oriented, and may be removed. Hence, this DP problem is finite. Processor output: { }. ***** We apply the Subterm Criterion Processor on D4 = (P4, R, i, c). We use the following projection function: nu(map_3#) = 4 We thus have: (1) cons(V1, W1) |>| W1 All DPs are strictly oriented, and may be removed. Hence, this DP problem is finite. Processor output: { }.